Some years ago while reading an issue in a French
magazine of Science came the idea that particles
mainly the elementary ones, can be described
otherwise saving their behaviour, properties
Say dealing with Protons means only a mere excuse
to dig into the whole world of particle physics.
That is as entities running under and in between
the Electromagnetic Field kingdom.
Interdisciplinary phenomena are so frequently found
that a turning point is always present.
I´ve took my decision starting with Proton although
and obviously Electron and Neutron must be named
always as related particles.
It seems poorly convincent the models and
procedures to depict particles behaviour after
collisions. Really one can hardly accept that those
proton´s byproducts from a target bombarded,were
the inner parts of any particle´s compounds.
Such fragments may always be the same whether
the energy of the ballistic beams or procedures
are always comparable too.
Nothing can confirm that those byproducts were
themselves before. Most experiments are destructive.
Best let particles tell us by itselves what really
they are and what is their continent.
Such byproducts are nothing but something like
electronic remaining noises due to some transitional
state between Proton 1 Proton 0.
I will attempt to see the Proton under other criterion.
Proton is the main compound in fission and fusion,
a powerful and useful ballistic beam in accelerators.
Nothing can modify its charge, gravity, mass or
spin, so do other particles. Mass and gravity
are continuous functions, but charge and spin
are discrete ones.
Moreover does not exists a continuous range
of masses in naturally occurring particles.
Surely it must have dimensions and shape but
in principle it´s not very important.
Related to shape it must be said that hardly
anybody could directly see any particle`s shape
because of the field surrounding particles must
be spheric and no light or wave can be reflected.
As for dimensions the starting point is the
interfacial surface between the EM field and the
particle itself, after my theory that particle`s
mass is a function of that acreage.
In order to start my work I have considered
necessary state some arguments as postulate
or background. Namely the fair bi-dimensional
Electromagnetic Maxwellian Field (EM) is the
real and very matter despite its apparent
emptiness: the mean into which all physics work.
(See Planck´s Theory of Electricity & Magnetism
Vol III pg 11), and my original idea:
a particle is, in principle, a bubble of naughtiness.
Also the Weyl´s idea of two kinds of charges and
the Higgs boson theory must be taken into account.
Print this Page
top of page
to page´s bottom
EM field properties are real and then granted
to particles despite we only can describe them
as particle´s properties.
It poses its rules, modify and accept physical
mechanics or not.
Later we will see the way how particles and
matter modify slightly some of its EM scarce
parameters or constants giving rise to an
interaction with gravitational phenomenon
and as Planck stated:
Every system that is
perfect in itself bears the stamp of inner
completeness and conceals no germ which
allow of further development. Rather the
impulse must come from without.
If some unification can occur after my theory it
will be as a consequence never as a purpose,
because of unification also means a close system.
I recognize that my theory will be in fact,
At the contrary I propose that any particle can
work simultaneously and independently in several
We ought to consider either there are four
fields working in unison -in cohabitation- or
four quite different properties of our well
known single and unique Electromagnetic Field.
I am strongly committed avoid additional new
real or intermediate particles on the landscape.
Is also of concern the proton´s binding
quality and the relativistic behaviour of an
orbital electron because relativity only stands for
any mechanics related to the Electromagnetic
field, externally exited or not.
As usually occurs with many other theories who
has not even opportunity to be experimented or
confirmed,it will probably the same with this
one. Thus I`ve decided start my work after all
genre of experiments have been done, validate
and published. Analyzing those results in such
a way to guide my thoughts.
Nevertheless predictions versus confirmations
also yields a good deal of information,useful to
any investigator. Results whatever they were
are always valuable information.
In order to achieve a good understanding
-between pragmatic and abstract- of proton´s
or any other particle behaviour, we must extend
our knowledge about the EM field mechanics. But
my initial purpose was to remain pragmatic.
My work is not oriented towards criticism or
any kind of revisionism.
I hope this my modest work could anyway supply
to some extent, to improve knowledge or at least
be useful as slight induction to somebody.-
This chimera has even rights to exist as others do.
Aldo R. Lazzarini, The Author.
Publishing in Internet becomes the faster,chipper
and easy way to publish. Furthermore one can add or
correct at will, while publishing, for life.
In fact Internet is the latest huge achievement